Showing posts with label Robert Beckhusen for Motherboard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robert Beckhusen for Motherboard. Show all posts

Friday, 16 December 2016

The US Navy’s Robotic Boats Are Getting Smarter

Between September 6 and October 3, 2016, the US Navy’s science and technology wing sent four small boats on patrol missions in the lower Chesapeake Bay. The only unusual thing was the fact that the boats were autonomous robots.

These robots are not like drones with humans operating them from a remote trailer in Arizona. The vessels, loaded with cameras and sensors, were more like autonomous individuals within a larger robotic collective. The Office of Naval Research, which put on the demonstration, had not done this before.

Well, not exactly. In 2014, the ONR sent 13 boats into the James River in Virginia and commanded them to “swarm” around vessels in different scenarios. The boats escorted “friendly” vessels or simulated attacks on potential “enemies.”

But the swarm was also kind of dumb. Where one boat went, the others went too. And at the same time, each boat had to individually determine how it would get there.

Read more: DARPA Is About to Start Testing an Autonomous, Submarine-Hunting Ocean Drone

Two years later in the Chesapeake, the ONR sent fewer boats, albeit smarterones that work better as a team.

The team of Navy rigid hull inflatable boats, or RHIBs, patrolled an area while watching out for incoming vessels, and when spotting one, worked together with a shared software package called CARACaS to assign a singleboat to approach it, classify the type of vessel it was looking at, and then transmit that information to the rest of the swarm.

At one point during the demonstration, two “enemy” vessels approached the swarm, one after the other, and the swarm dispatched a single boat, and then a second, to follow each one. The remaining two boats held back.

Electro-optical and infrared sensors mounted on an unmanned boat which joined a ‘swarm’ of other vessels in the Chesapeake Bay, October 2016. Photo: US Navy

The researchers tilted the scales slightly by programming the boats in advance with images of “enemy” vessels, but the fact the little flotilla could spot, identify, and then track ships with individual robots is noteworthy. For one, it means it can go after multiple threats instead of just one at a time.

And instead of simply escorting or attacking—the only two previous options in the 2014 demonstration—the swarm can now patrol an area on its own in addition to trailing an enemy, classifying it as good or bad, or tracking it with sensors.

In theory, the ONR could order a boat to automatically attack a vessel identified as an enemy, but these boats did not include that particular mission as an option—this time.

The only humans involved were researchers sitting at remote stations with low-bandwidth connections. They could have intervened if necessary, but the boats did their own thing. The ONR even provided a video showing the demonstration in action:

As to why this is significant, look at how automation is not just making inroads within the military. In the 20th century, the assembly line transformed the economy, mechanized transportation and created a revolution in warfare.

In the 21st century, automation is laying off assembly line workers, and turning vehicles into robots with enormous consequences for major industries. Now apply that to a battlefield—or a naval engagement.

“We envision unmanned boats doing protection missions, escort missions, we envision them doing intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance missions,” Cmdr. Luis Molina of the ONR told reporters on December 14. “Really, helping our ships and our sailors getting out and expanding their sphere of influence and being able to control larger areas of the ocean and determine what’s going on.”

ONR has been working on CARACaS for around 13 years, but in a span of a mere two years, went from having a robotic boat swarm that does one thing at a time, to a swarm capable of tracking and intercepting multiple targets.

That’s fast. If you gave the boats some machine guns—not included on the ONR’s demonstration boats—and a human weapons operator sitting at a remote terminal, you’d have a pretty effective robotic harbor defense force. Give the boats torpedoes and have them go on the attack, and how could a navy possibly defend itself? Not well.

“We have every intention of using those unmanned systems to enable our sailors to engage a threat, and destroy it if necessary,” the ONR’s then-chief Rear Adm. Matthew Klunder said after the James River test two years ago. “But let me anchor on one really important factor here that’s critical to us. There is always a human in the loop of designation of a target, and if so be it, destruction of the target.”

Now fast forward another 20 or 30 years. The same technology could be combined with larger ships such as the Sea Hunter, a 132-foot-long robotic trimaran being developed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to hunt submarines—which, by the way, has components shared with CARACaS.

This barely touches on the advances in aerial drones, which could one day communicate with unmanned vessels —all autonomously—and combine their sensors into a powerful package.

One problem is that doing so requires a lot of bandwidth for all the data packets flying back and forth. A swarm of boats at sea will need a powerful network. Molina cautioned that the swarm’s network was rudimentary on purpose, and just enough to complete this particular demonstration.

Make the swarm bigger, and assign it more missions, and you’ll need a lot more bandwidth.

This story originally ran on War Is Boring.



from The US Navy’s Robotic Boats Are Getting Smarter

Thursday, 27 October 2016

Iraq Moves Its Terrifying Thermobaric Rocket Tanks to Mosul

A Russian TOS-1A Buratino. Photo: Vitaly V. Kuzmin

Iraqi troops fighting for Mosul’s outskirts have brought along one of their most fearsome weapons: the 60-ton, Russian-made TOS-1A Buratino.

A photograph and tweet from the Jerusalem Post’s Seth Frantzman shows Iraqi troops posing with the rocket launcher near Bartella, a battle-scarred Assyrian Christian town less than 10 miles from Mosul. Iraqi Counter-Terrorism Service troops took over the town on October 20, one of dozens freed since the offensive began October 16.

But Mosul is different as Iraq’s densely populated, second largest city. And the Islamic State has had more than two years to plan and prepare ambushes, tunnels and improvised explosive traps.

“They’ve had a long time to prepare for that fight, so all of that we’re going to contend with here very, very soon,” Gen. Joseph Votel, commander of US forces in the Middle East, told NBC News during a visit to an American forward base.

It's time 2give #ISIS taste of this; Qaraqosh-Bartella sector enthusiastic #Iraq army men await orders to punish the enemy #Mosul_Offensive pic.twitter.com/bHS1dorTrd
— Seth Frantzman (@sfrantzman) October 22, 2016

Which might explain why Iraq brought along its TOS-1As. See, the Buratino—meaning Pinocchio—is unlike conventional artillery which lob high-explosive shells at long ranges. It’s more terrifying than that.

The TOS-1 is relatively shorter range and kills almost entirely with pressure.

Each of the launcher’s 24 thermobaric rockets contains a flammable chemical which disperses into the air above a target. Once dispersed, the rockets detonate—and in a flash—devastate an area roughly 200 by 300 meters wide. The fuel-air blast has a hideous effect on the human body, rupturing internal organs and suffocating the lungs.

As brutal as that is, the Buratino is precisely the kind of weapon the Iraqi army would want if it was worried about dug-in infantry, such as Islamic State fighters hiding in tunnels.

But at the same time, Mosul is also full of civilians.

Russian TOS-1A Buratinos in action. Photo: Vitaly V. Kuzmin

“In general, the TOS-1 or TOS-1As fills the same niche as the RPO series flamethrowers, but on a much larger scale,” analyst Charles Bartles wrote in a report for the US Army’s Foreign Military Studies Office. “They will most often be utilized in urban warfare settings, bunker busting, and clearing light infantry.”

Iraq received at least four TOS-1As from Russia in 2014. The launcher rests on a T-72 tank chassis. The Russian army heavily fired Buratino rockets at cities in Chechnya during the 1999 war.

One of the Buratino’s biggest liabilities is its range of around 6,000 meters. By comparison, the US Army’s Paladin guns and HIMARS rocket artillery—both deployed to Iraq—can blast enemies from 11 and 298 miles, respectively.

This makes the TOS-1A more vulnerable to attack, and it’d be unwise to be anywhere near one—and its thermobaric rockets—were it to explode. A unconfirmed video apparently depicting a missile attack on a Syrian army Buratino in 2016 shows why.

And as War Is Boring’s Sebastien Roblin points out at The National Interest, the rockets’ blast radius poses a significant danger to civilians, such as in densely-populated Mosul.

During the 2015–2016 battle for Ramadi, the Iraqi army devastated swathes of that city with artillery. But during the battle for Hit, where the Islamic State prevented civilians from fleeing and used them as human shields, Baghdad reigned its artillery in.

In Mosul, like in Hit, the terror group is repeating the same war crime, according to the United Nations, as has executed hundreds more. As a result, thousands of ordinary people are in danger.

This post originally ran on War Is Boring.

Get six of our favorite Motherboard stories every day by signing up for our newsletter.



from Iraq Moves Its Terrifying Thermobaric Rocket Tanks to Mosul